Reports from the Firefox development team say they are working hard to make it use less memory – they obviously think it can do better but is Firefox currently more greedy for RAM than Chrome and IE?
We put all three browsers to the test on a Windows 7 system with 1GB of RAM – not everyone has 4GB and 1GB of RAM is the typical amount in XP systems (50% of the world’s computers) and new W7 netbooks and many unlucky Vista laptops. We wanted to see which browser is the slimmer of the year and which is the beached whale – so let the battle commence!
How We Tested – New installation of W7 with all updates and SP1 applied. Latest browser versions installed – Firefox 5, IE9 and Chrome 13. All browsers left at default settings – you shouldn’t have to be a tech guru to make a browser work properly!
Adobe Reader, Java and Adobe Flash Player installed as these are standard on most computers. Adobe’s Flash was disabled in Chrome (see our article on Shockwave Flash crashes in Chrome) to allow Chrome’s integrated plugin to handle Flash – the default. No other plugins, add-ons, themes or extensions were installed. Homepage was set to Google.
Test 1 – Open the browser (Google homepage only) and check RAM usage:
Chrome – 60 MB
IE – 62 MB
Firefox – 64 MB
Winner – Chrome, but too close for a meaningful result as only 4 MB difference between all three.
Test 2 – Open a sample set of 10 websites (same for all browsers, not multimedia rich sites) in separate tabs:
Firefox – 271 MB
IE9 – 307 MB
Chrome – 580 MB
Winner – Firefox. Used less RAM than the others, closely followed by IE. Chrome really did suck 😉 It sucked up more than twice the amount of RAM that Firefox did and almost double IE – a surprise to us as Chrome’s reputation was supposedly built on clever memory management. Chrome and Firefox were equally speedy in opening the tabs but IE struggled to render the pages and took an age longer than the others to finish.
Test 3 – Closed all 10 tabs, leaving just the Google homepage open:
IE – 123 MB
Chrome – 130 MB
Firefox – 145 MB
Winner – IE. Very close results which show how much RAM has not been freed up by the browsers – even after the 10 tabs are closed, they are all still using double the RAM they used at the start. Firefox came bottom but not by much – not nearly enough to warrant the term memory hog in our opinion.
Test 4 – Time to sort out the men from the boys! Open a different sample set of 10 websites in separate tabs. This time they were more multimedia rich so should use more RAM:
Firefox – 490 MB Usable for browsing all 10 sites
IE – 545 MB Very slow and almost unusable for browsing
Chrome – 600 MB Very slow and almost unusable for browsing. Leaks memory like a sieve on video rich sites.
Winner – Firefox. The runaway winner, not only used much less RAM but also let us browse all 10 websites at a reasonable speed. IE and Chrome failed miserably on this test – not allowing us to actually browse the open tabs.
Test 5 – Closed all 10 tabs, leaving just the Google homepage open.
Firefox – 160 MB
IE – ??? Crashed when trying to close the last four tabs but automatically recovered the pages and allowed them to be closed
Chrome – ??? Crashed when trying to close the 10 tabs, could not be recovered and had to be shut down completely. So much for its vaunted system of running each tab in a separate process which is supposed to stop one tab crash from affecting the rest of Chrome itself…
We tested Chrome from scratch again and were able to close the tabs if we acted quickly – before it had drained too much RAM from the system. However, this is not acceptable as we wouldn’t have time to read the open tabs!
Winner – Firefox. The runaway winner again and the only browser that let us close all the tabs without crashing so we could continue browsing if required! IE crashed but did recover enough to allow us to close the final few tabs. Chrome failed miserably and in the end we had to close it.
Firefox – a runaway winner. Firefox was the only browser that actually completed our tests and it used the least RAM when multiple tabs were opened.
The only slight downside is that it didn’t free up quite as much RAM as the others in Test 3 (when tabs were closed) but the difference was minimal. If Firefox 7 improves that further we would expect it to sweep the board.
Highly recommended if you have less than 2 GB of RAM!
IE – a decent showing on the first 3 tests but was slow to display pages.
Badly let down in test 4 (like wading through treacle) and it crashed on test 5. It couldn’t cope with more than a handful of multimedia rich sites so we can’t recommend it.
Chrome – the biggest surprise here. We knew Firefox was good but we went into this with our eyes open and half expected the increasingly popular Chrome to blow it away – the results proved quite the opposite as Firefox (and even IE) trounced Chrome…
Chrome sucked up shockingly high amounts of RAM in Tests 2 and 4, was unusable after extended viewing of more than a handful of multimedia rich sites and it crashed so badly in Test 5 that we had to manually close it. An outright fail.